How Many Gb Is Elden Ring Xbox?

Prepare yourself to play this lil guy (or not) right at midnight – Okay, so you’ve researched exactly what hour you can start playing Elden Ring, Perhaps you have lined up your favorite snacks to prepare for your late-night adventure in The Lands Between. However, there’s one final (albeit less sexy) preparation you’ll have to make, which might be tedious as hell.

How much storage space do you need to free up to download Elden Ring ? As I sit here writing this and staring at the countdown on my PS4, Elden Ring initially downloads 14.207 GB worth of content. However, the game’s true file size is significantly larger, and you’ll need the “true size” free on your system for the game to begin downloading at all.

Curiously, the amount of storage required for Elden Ring is a little different for each platform. Elden Ring takes up just under 45 GB on the PS5 and PS4 (44.47 and 44.94, respectively). Xbox will require 49 GB, and PCs take the file storage cake with a 60 GB requirement.

1. Hopefully, everyone’s in the mood for a spot of early spring cleaning.
2. You haven’t played Red Dead Redemption 2 in a while, right? That alone could hold two – even three – Elden Rings ! For context: Elden Ring is the newest game from Hidetaka Miyazaki and FromSoftware, the director and studio behind the infamous Dark Souls series.

What’s more, the scenario was written by Game of Thrones author George R.R. Martin. If the reviews are anything to go by, Elden Ring will be well worth cleaning those gigs off your console’s drive. (image: Bandai Namco) Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site ! — The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.— Have a tip we should know?
View complete answer

How big is Elden Ring on Xbox?

Elden Ring File Size – With Elden Ring reportedly taking around 30 hours to finish, its file size is surprisingly compact compared to other AAA games. With the Xbox preloading now live, we know the file size for Xbox consoles is 49.04 GB, though this may increase if a separate day one patch is required.

• The file size on PS4 is reported to be 44.929 GB, according to Twitter account PlayStation Game Size, though this likely doesn’t include a day one patch.
• There’s no confirmed file size for the PC version of the game yet, though the recently released PC requirements for Elden Ring requires players to have at least 60GB of free space for the game.

To help expedite this process, PC gamers can download game-ready drivers for the game, In the meantime, you can also check out 13 things you need to know about Elden Ring ahead of its release, and read our Elden Ring review in progress. As you set out on your journey across The Lands Between, be sure to check out our various guides, including how to get a horse, the best first route to take, and which class best suits your play style,
View complete answer

How many gigabytes is Elden Ring?

Installation Size & File Systems: 50 GB – Starting off with the least interesting of all size considerations: Elden Ring’s file size. At the time of writing this article, Elden Ring’s Steam version is sitting pretty at 50 GB in total, In comparison, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla with its immense Dawn of Ragnarok expansion pack should be about twice as big, at 100ish GB in total.

• It’s a curious discrepancy, because we can assure you with utmost certainty that Elden Ring isn’t really much smaller than Valhalla,
• Depending on how you qualify original content, it’s potentially several times as substantial, but that’s a topic for another day.
• The trick lies in asset quality, really.

As aesthetically striking and visually pleasing as Elden Ring might be, FromSoftware hasn’t ever been particularly meticulous about the technical side of its games, To that end, it’s easy enough to save space when your textures and assets aren’t as detailed as those used in some other games might be.
View complete answer

Is Elden Ring fine on Xbox?

Elden Ring: the last-gen analysis – can the older consoles still cut it? The dust has settled after Elden Ring’s release and now there’s a moment to check out the last-gen versions – the state of PS4, Xbox One, Pro and One X, and fundamentally, to see if any of these consoles can deliver a decent experience.

With current-gen console stocks thin on the ground, do you really need to upgrade? Bearing in mind the discourse surrounding Elden Ring performance, the prospects may not seem great but as it happens, of the four last-gen renditions available, PS4 Pro and Xbox One X aren’t bad, the base PS4 is acceptable – and it’s only Xbox One S that must be avoided.

That isn’t hyperbole: Elden Ring on the base Microsoft machine is a profoundly unsatisfying experience – the version with the heaviest compromises in both playability and visuals. We saw it during the network beta of course, so maybe we shouldn’t be too surprised.

Again, developer From Software uses several tricks to try squeeze base Xbox into a playable state, at a reduced 900p resolution and 30fps frame-rate. Just emerging to Limgrave, a low setting is used for environmental shadows. Grass density also uses the engine’s very lowest setting (seemingly lower than low on PC) and ultimately it makes Limgrave look barren, lacking any depth.

Worse still, visual features such as ambient occlusion and shadows are significantly dialled back on the base console – leaving scenes with a low-cast sun with an unusually sparse appearance. A detailed look at how Elden Ring checks out on the last generation of Xbox and PlayStation hardware.

The turnout is the worst looking version of Elden Ring out there. Honestly, for anyone still toughing it out on a base Xbox One, I’d strongly recommend waiting for a hardware upgrade if you want the best first-time experience with this phenomenal game. Our time with Xbox One revealed an exceptionally compromised release.

In fact, one of the worst parts is the state of enemy animations. Even at the near-to-mid range, you’ll see enemies run at a unique frame-rate – much lower than the rest of gameplay – until they move within attacking range. All console platforms use this low-refresh animation trick to an extent, to improve and stabilise performance, but Xbox One takes it to a glaring extreme.

• Despite all of these compromises, you’re looking at a 20-30fps experience – and even if the game does hit its performance target, From’s signature inconsistent frame-pacing makes it look like it’s running at a lower frame-rate anyway: the final nail in the coffin.
• The base PlayStation 4 is far from offering the best rendition of the game, but it holds up surprisingly well stacked up against the Xbox One version.

Resolution is a typical 1080p, grass density is improved, while ambient occlusion, shadows and draw distances – though far from being on PS5 and Series X’s level – hold up relatively well. Those jarring lower frame-rate enemy animation on Xbox One are also less intrusive overall, though still detectable.

In every sense base PS4 feels like the console From Software targeted as the standard release; no bells or whistles, but a just-about passable way to play. It presents a baseline experience from which PS4 Pro, and PS5 build on, and on a 1080p display the base machine does the job reasonably well. Xbox One S Xbox One X PS4 PS4 Pro Limgrave compared across all last-gen machines.

PS4 targets a native 1080p, Xbox One sits at 900p, while PS4 Pro renders at 1800p via a reconstruction technique. As for One X, resolution dynamically shifts between 1512p and 1800p. Xbox One S Xbox One X PS4 PS4 Pro Overall effects quality is on par between all versions, though lighting quality is reduced in accuracy on Xbox One near the fireplace on the right of this image.

• Xbox One S Xbox One X PS4 PS4 Pro Core geometric details and textures are identical between all four systems.
• Sadly Xbox One removes a depth of field effect during cut-scenes.
• Xbox One S Xbox One X PS4 PS4 Pro Grass density is heavily pared back on Xbox One, whereas PS4, PS4 Pro and One X use matching settings to fill the space.

Curiously, One X’s use of a ‘auto-detect settings’ mode means ambient occlusion doesn’t engage in certain areas (notably under grass here) while under load. Likewise, motion blur is disengaged in this case too – though both AO and blur re-engage for other scenes.

Visually speaking, PS4 hands in a solid take on Elden Ring’s world, though performance isn’t entirely ideal. Frame-rate readings mostly land at 30fps if blighted with the expected issues in uneven frame-pacing we’ve seen in Souls titles on console. There are some notable dips under too; drops below 30fps are usually limited to areas with lots of enemies.

It’s a huge upgrade on Xbox One, but using fast travel, or facing effects-heavy moments hammers the system. A 25-30fps performance level during the battle with the dragon in Limgrave, for example, is the worst case scenario I’ve seen, but even then, the drops are fleeting.

Given the low stock of PS5 consoles right now, this is still an acceptable way to jump into Elden Ring ahead of buying new hardware. Next up for consideration is PS4 Pro, delivering two key upgrades over the base PS4: resolution and frame-rate. Most of the visual settings, including grass density and shadow resolution appear identical to the base console in direct comparisons – and you’d need to move to a current-gen console to better that.

Resolution is the main way that PS4 Pro leverages its GPU advantage, boosting its native pixel count to 1800p via the same checkerboard rendering technique we last saw in Sekiro. Other than that, we have an advantage in frame-rate: the 30fps cap is removed to leave performance entirely unlocked on Pro hardware.

1. You’ll never get to 60fps even looking right up at the sky (the lowest rendering load, typically) but 30-50fps across the run of play is reasonable enough.
2. Running unlocked isn’t ideal, but it’s better than the poorly implemented 30fps cap seen on the base PS4.
3. Xbox One S Xbox One X Xbox Series X (Quality Mode) What is the generational difference in moving to Xbox Series X? Base Xbox One users see a huge cutback in grass detail here, though One X pushes a reasonable, middle-ground setting.

Xbox One S Xbox One X Xbox Series X (Quality Mode) Texture filtering on base Xbox One is dropped aggressively. Paired with its 900p image the results are significantly less clear next to the dynamic 1800p on One X, and native 4K on Series X’s quality mode.

1. Xbox One S Xbox One X Xbox Series X (Quality Mode) Shadows also scale as you’d expect.
2. Series X’s quality mode offers a huge upgrade over the One X version here, which turns in some unsightly moments for shade cast by trees.
3. PS4 PS4 Pro PS5 (Quality Mode) Moving over to the PlayStation family of systems, PS4 and PS4 Pro are locked in place with matching core visual settings – divided only by the 1080p image on base PS4, versus a reconstructed 1800p on PS4 Pro.

PS5 trumps both with a native 4K image in its quality mode here. PS4 PS4 Pro PS5 (Quality Mode) A boost in grass density is a huge perk of playing on PS5 (in either frame-rate or quality modes) – though both PS4 and PS4 Pro offer a respectable setting below it.

Also note motion blur is active on both last-gen Sony consoles, much like PS5’s quality mode. PS4 PS4 Pro PS5 (Quality Mode) A final shot of Margit the Fell reveals little is dialled back in core world detail, and last-gen systems still look great if you can accept a lower frame-rate. This leads us onto Xbox One X, which effectively has the exact same visual setup as PS4 Pro – but with one exception.

Checkerboard rendering is swapped out for native resolution, with a dynamic range that appears to sit between 1512p and 1800p. Potentially this could hit a full 4K – as we’ve established running the One X code on Series X hardware – but given the GPU limits of the last-gen machine, 1800p is the real world limit.

Also, the choice to run at a dynamic range of resolutions, bottoming out at 1512p, often means One X renders more pixels per frame than PS4 Pro’s 1800p via checkerboarding. The one downside is that performance operates at a lower 30-40fps range, typically worse than PS5 in matching areas. It’s also worth noting One X’s visual settings adjust more aggressively, seemingly based on load.

As you can see in our comparison above, it results in One X dialling back ambient occlusion on grass and even motion blur in some scenes – where PS4 and PS4 Pro leave these settings fixed in place regardless. Ascertaining which of the last-gen machines offers a superior turnout isn’t exactly easy.

• The higher resolution and potential for higher settings where One X’s GPU might stretch to it are possible advantages (the same dynamic settings management seen on Xbox One S applies to One X) – but it’s rarely a clear-cut advantage in side-by-side shots.
• PS4 Pro’s superior frame-rate is more noticeable, making it my preference of the two despite leaning into checkerboard rendering – but playing Elden Ring on Xbox One X is a comparable experience overall.

PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X are where you need to be in order to get a top-tier Elden Ring experience. I also took a look at loading times. For best-in-class loading speeds, PS5 is of course the front-runner – with a four to seven second range in respawning to a site of grace.

Still the last-gen consoles are acceptable enough, I think. For example, dying to Margit the Fell takes us to a nearby site of grace, with PS4 Pro turning in the best result at 24 seconds, closely trailed by One X at 26 seconds – and then the two base consoles on around 29 seconds. And likewise, respawning to the Stormgate entrance area gives a similar order – and thankfully all the results are faster in this case.

PS4 Pro leads with a 17 second result, One X at 18 seconds, PS4 at 19 seconds and base Xbox One at 20 seconds. Overall, the turnout isn’t exactly snappy on any last-gen console and faster would be better, especially to get back to a boss for another attempt.

• However, if you’re familiar with the downtime in Dark Souls 3 or Bloodborne, you’ll be familiar with the length of wait here.
• It should be noted that these results are on stock drives – upgrading to SSD should cut those times down significantly.
• To see this content please enable targeting cookies.
• So, do you need to upgrade your console to get a satisfying Elden Ring experience? Surprisingly, no! The frank summary is that PS4 Pro and Xbox One X deliver serviceable takes on the game if you’re happy with lower grass and shadow settings next to Series X and PS5 versions, and if higher performance and longer loading times aren’t a deal-breaker.

If you’re OK with that, the enhanced consoles work just fine, with Pro taking a lead on the frame-rate side. The standard PS4 isn’t quite as refined, but its 1080p30 target is met to an overall acceptable degree – dodgy frame-pacing notwithstanding. I’d argue that any first time play through of Elden Ring is wasted on Xbox One.

• A game of this scope deserves much better, and I’d strongly advise waiting for a console upgrade in that scenario – even the handheld Steam Deck running at 720p on hybrid medium/high settings wipes the floor with the vanilla Xbox One experience.
• The point is, you have options: three out of the four last-gen renditions of Elden Ring are perfectly acceptable, and of those three, PS4 Pro and Xbox One X aren’t bad at all – even if higher quality settings and performance are reserved for the new generation of console hardware.

: Elden Ring: the last-gen analysis – can the older consoles still cut it?
View complete answer

Is Elden Ring as large as Skyrim?

Elden Ring Has More Vast & Complex Exploration Than Skyrim – Again, Skyrim represents a huge step forward when it comes to exploration. The game offers a number of sights and touchstones that can be discovered organically, while also featuring many secrets and lore-rich areas that are connected to its many quests.

By the time most players finish with Skyrim, the in-game map will be littered with fast-travel markers tied to cities, ruins, monuments, and much more. Skyrim ‘s exploration holds up, but Elden Ring offers the overall better experience for adventurous players. There are shockingly few non-optional areas in Elden Ring, which supports a sense of unbound, unguided exploration.

This approach to map design is deepened by just how vertical and condensed the actual topography of the game is. While many open-world games, even some of the most critically acclaimed like Breath of the Wild, will often feature large stretches of empty land, this is not the case in Elden Ring,

• Many of the game’s most important and expansive locations are hidden just out of sight, and players can easily miss entrances to caves, dungeons, and other secret areas by not closely examining each bush, building, and cliffside.
• This leads to a feeling that anything can happen whilst exploring the Lands Between, whereas a game like Skyrim will typically overtly draw the player’s attention to the most important areas, making for a more passive experience.

Players have to use Elden Ring’ s actual in-game map, too, as the game is considerably larger than Skyrim, According to a Stack Exchange post from Martin Sojka, the total surface area of Bethesda’s 2011 RPG comes out to just over 14 square miles – certainly nothing to scoff at.

1. Meanwhile, however, Elden Ring has been determined by Reddit user Lusty-Batch to weigh in at a whopping 79 square kilometers, or 30.5 square miles, making it more than twice the size of Skyrim,
2. Skyrim ‘s base game has 343 fast-travel locations, while Elden Ring has 300.
3. However, it’s important to keep in mind that Elden Ring players can only fast travel to sites of grace, whereas Skyrim allows players to fast travel to just about any location they come across.

Given how many locations Elden Ring features that are not sites of grace, the game has a far greater number of unique locations to explore. Traversal in both games is worth mentioning as well. Elden Ring ‘s Torrent might not have enough lore, but the spectral steed plays a vital role in exploration, as players will have to use him for various platforming challenges in the open world, challenges that give way to valuable exploration opportunities.

This can be contrasted with the many horses players can obtain in Skyrim, which primarily serve as a way to cross broad, empty stretches of land quicker. It may not be fair to outright state that Elden Ring is a better game than Skyrim, After all, Skyrim was released over ten years before FromSoftware’s 2022 opus, and it offers a much more casual, relaxed experience with countless strengths.

However, when examining the maps of each game, the size, diversity, and opportunities for meaningful exploration in Skyrim are dwarfed by Elden Ring, Next: Every Elden Ring NPC You Can Accidentally Kill Sources: Martin Sojka/Stack Exchange, Lusty-Batch/Reddit
View complete answer

Why PS5 is better than Xbox?

The PS5’s unique features create an added level of immersion – Horizon Call of the Mountain will be available on the PS VR2. Horizon Call of the Mountain / Sony The Xbox Series X also fails to match some of the PS5’s console-specific features. Sony’s exclusives make special use of the PS5’s DualSense controller, which has a built-in speaker and sensitive haptic feedback that’s not available on Xbox.

While these features don’t make a huge difference in gameplay, they do bring an added level of immersion and make playing the PS5 feel like a more distinct experience. The upcoming PlayStation VR2 will further add to the number of unique experiences on the PS5. Xbox Series X does have other console-exclusive features like quick resume, which stores the exact place you stopped playing and lets you swap between games without lengthy initial loading screens.

However, quick resume doesn’t work for every game and mostly speeds up navigation rather than enhancing your gameplay experience.
View complete answer